Artikel Jurnal UNS (96)
Artikel Populer (18)
Artikel Prosiding (167)
Buku Ajar (11)
Laporan Penelitian Dosen (55)
Laporan Tugas Akhir (D III) (12850)
Laporan Tugas Akhir (D IV) (761)
Pengukuhan Guru Besar (67)
Proposal Skripsi (11)
A Comparative Analysis on Metafunctions of Poems Entitled “A Soldier” by Rupert Brooke And “Dulce Et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen (A Study of Systemic Functional Linguistics)
|Penulis Utama||:||Ingouf Imam Setiawan|
|NIM / NIP||:|
|Judul||:||A Comparative Analysis on Metafunctions of Poems Entitled “A Soldier” by Rupert Brooke And “Dulce Et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen (A Study of Systemic Functional Linguistics)|
|Imprint||:||Surakarta - FSSR - 2005|
|Kolasi||:||xx, 148 hal.: lamp.; 4 inci.|
|Sumber||:||UNS - FSSR NIM. C0398039|
This thesis analyzes the metafunction of two poems. It is a descriptive qualitative research. The sources of data are two poems which are written during the first world war written by Wilfred Owen entitled Dulce et Decorusm Est and by Rupert Brooke entitled The Soldier. The research is aimed to describe the metafunction of the text which covers the ideational meaning, the interpersonal meaning, and the textual meaning. To reach this puspose, this research was conducted through Systemis Functional Linguistics (SFL). In taking the data, the researcher applies purpossive sampling technique. Purpossive sampling technique is conducted by the way of selecting samples based o n certain criteria. The sample was taken by selecting the poems from an internet website: http:www.firstworldwar.com/poetandprose.htm which were written during the First World War. They were two poems that is written by Wilfred Owen entitled "Dulce et Decorum Est" and the other is written by Rupert Brooke entitled "The Soldier".
In conducting the research, the researcher analyzed each datum based o n its clause system, complexity of groups, type of interdependency and logico semantic relation, transitivity, MOOD system, modality and polarity, lexical density, thematic structure, abstraction and technicality, metaphor, cohesion, and text structure.The interpretation leads the reseacher to describe the metafunction of both poems.
The result of the analysis shows that text I has a more complicated way in expressing the flow of ideational meaning than text II. Yet, text I has a higher readability level than text II since text II use more abstractions than text I. Both poems has the same unequal status between the writer and the readers in which the writer has a higher status than the readers. Evenso the status between the writer of both poems and the participants inside is equal. The writer of text I involves the readers and the participant inside the story (the soldier), while the writer of text II o nly involves the participant of the story (England) and lets the readers uninvolved. Text I also use more familiar language than text II which makes text I has a higher readability level than text II. The writer of text I gives a negative judgement to all the participants in the poem, whereas the writer of text II gives a positive judgement to all the participants. Both text I and text II have the same printed medium, but different chaannel in which text I tends to be a spoken channel while text II tends to be a spoken-written channel. After concluding the analysis, the researcher also gives some recommendations to linguistics and literary lecturers, linguistics students who are interested in SFL study, other researchers, and also poets or those who want to be a poet.
Harus menjadi member dan login terlebih dahulu untuk bisa download.
|Fakultas||:||Fak. Sastra dan Seni Rupa|