Comparative study of tenor on news texts on greenpeace and japan times related to the fukushima nuclear crisis: a systemic functional linguistics approach
Penulis Utama
:
Anggun Dwi Wulan S.P.
NIM / NIP
:
C0309007
×This research belongs to a qualitative research applying descriptive
comparative method. This research compared the tenor of news texts in the
Greenpeace and Japan Times related to the Fukushima nuclear crisis using
Systemic Functional Linguistics approach. It aims to find out the three
elements of tenor: status, affect, and contact. It is also intended to explore the
ideology of each text then find out the similarities and differences of both texts.
The data were lexicogrammar, genre, and text structure. The sources of
data were the news texts about Fukushima nuclear crisis published by
Greenpeace in www.greenpeace.org on February 19, 2013 and Japan Times in
www.japantimes.co.j in August 3, 2012. The total sampling technique was
applied in this research because the researcher took and analyzed all the clauses
in the both texts. The content analysis technique: domain analysis, taxonomy
analysis, componential analysis, and finding cultural value were applied in
analyzing the data to define the elements of tenor: status, affect, contact and the
ideology of each text and find out the similarities and differences.
Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded that both texts applied
different status. Greenpeace applied unequal status. The writer applied higher
position than the readers. Japan Times, on the other hand, applied equal status
between the writer, the readers, and the informants.
Both texts also have different ways in judging the issue. Greenpeace
judged the issue negatively by blaming the government and nuclear industry
for the nuclear disaster. Japan times judge the issue in more neutral ways,
although all of the informants give negative judgment toward the issue.
Based on the familiarity and the readability of the language, both texts are
understandable for their target readers. Based on the degree of involvement, the
Greenpeace writer intended to involve himself in the text, while the Japan
Times writer did not.
The ideologies between the texts are different. Greenpeace applied leftantagonist,
while Japan Times applied left-protagonist ideology. The ideology
influences the linguistic choice in the text.
×
Penulis Utama
:
Anggun Dwi Wulan S.P.
Penulis Tambahan
:
1. 2.
NIM / NIP
:
C0309007
Tahun
:
2013
Judul
:
Comparative study of tenor on news texts on greenpeace and japan times related to the fukushima nuclear crisis: a systemic functional linguistics approach
Edisi
:
Imprint
:
Surakarta - FSSR - 2013
Program Studi
:
S-1 Sastra Inggris
Kolasi
:
Sumber
:
UNS-FSSR Jur. Sastra Inggris-C.0309007-2013
Kata Kunci
:
Jenis Dokumen
:
Skripsi
ISSN
:
ISBN
:
Link DOI / Jurnal
:
-
Status
:
Public
Pembimbing
:
1. Drs. Riyadi Santosa M.Ed.,Ph.D.
Penguji
:
Catatan Umum
:
Fakultas
:
Fak. Sastra dan Seni Rupa
×
File
:
Harus menjadi member dan login terlebih dahulu untuk bisa download.
