ABSTRAKPenelitian dan penulisan tesis ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui akibat hukumyang timbul apabila terjadi pengalihan objek jaminan fidusia yang dilakukan olehDebitor Pemberi Fidusia tanpa persetujuan Kreditor Penerima Fidusia dan alasanpenerima hukum harus mendapatkan perlindungan hukum apabila terjadipengalihan objek jaminan fidusia yang dilakukan oleh Debitor Pemberi Fidusiatanpa persetujuan Kreditor Penerima Fidusia dan perlindungan hukum yangdiberikan kepada Kreditor Penerima Fidusia apabila terjadi pengalihan objekjaminan fidusia yang dilakukan oleh Debitor Pemberi Fidusia tanpa persetujuanKreditor Penerima Fidusia.Metode penelitian hukum yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalahmetode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan data sekunder yangterdiri dari bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, dan bahan hukumtertier, dan data yang diperoleh dianalisis dengan mengunakan analisis yuridisnormatif.Penelitian yang telah dilakukan diperoleh hasil bahwa apabila terjadipengalihan objek jaminan fidusia yang dilakukan oleh Debitor Pemberi Fidusiatanpa persetujuan Kreditor Penerima Fidusia akan menimbulkan akibat hukum,Kreditor Penerima Fidusia dapat menuntut Debitor Pemberi Fidusia untukmelakukan pemenuhan prestasi pelunasan utangnya, dan perlindungan hukumyang diberikan kepada Kreditor Penerima Fidusia dapat berupa dalam bentukpreventif (sebelum) maupun represif (setelah) terjadinya pengalihan objekjaminan fidusia tanpa persetujuan Kreditor Penerima Fidusia.Saran yang penulis dapat berikan adalah Notaris sebelum pembuatan AktaJaminan Fidusia sebaiknya memberikan penyuluhan hukum mengenai laranganlarangandalam Undang-Undang Jaminan Fidusia kepada para pihak yang akanmembuat akta.Kata Kunci: Perlindungan Hukum, Pengalihan objek jaminan fidusia, PenerimaFidusia, Pemberi Fidusia.ABSTRACTThis thesis research and writing are aimed at determining the resultinglegal consequences in case of the transfer of fiduciary security objects done by theDebitor as the Fiduciary Provider without obtaining the approval of the Creditoras the Fiduciary Recipient and the legal grounds why the Creditor shall receivelegal protection in case of the transfer of fiduciary security objects done by theDebitor as the Fiduciary Provider without obtaining the approval of the Creditoras the Fiduciary Recipient as well as the legal protection given to the Creditor asthe Fiduciary Recipient in case of the transfer of fiduciary security objects doneby the Debitor as the Fiduciary Provider without obtaining the approval of theCreditor as the Fiduciary Recipient.The normative legal research method was employed in this legal researchusing secondary data consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legalmaterials. The obtained data were analyzed using the normative juridicalanalysis.The research findings suggest that the transfer of fiduciary security objectsdone by the Debitor as the Fiduciary Provider without obtaining the approval ofthe Creditor as the Fiduciary Recipient will bring legal consequences, i.e. theCreditor as the Fiduciary Recipient may sue the Debitor as the FiduciaryProvider to completely repay its debts, and the legal protection given to theCreditor as the Fiduciary Recipient may be either in the form of preventiveactions done previously or repressive actions done after the transfer of fiduciarysecurity objects without obtaining the approval of the Creditor as the FiduciaryRecipient has been undertaken.The suggestions which the author can offer is that the Notary prior to theissuance of the Fiduciary Security Deed should provide legal counselingregarding matters which do not conform with the Law on Fiduciary Security tothe parties intending to make a deed.Keywords: Legal Protection, Transfer of Fiduciary Security Objects, Creditor,Debitor.