ABSTRAK
Penelitian dan penulisan tesis ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui akibat hukum
yang timbul apabila terjadi pengalihan objek jaminan fidusia yang dilakukan oleh
Debitor Pemberi Fidusia tanpa persetujuan Kreditor Penerima Fidusia dan alasan
penerima hukum harus mendapatkan perlindungan hukum apabila terjadi
pengalihan objek jaminan fidusia yang dilakukan oleh Debitor Pemberi Fidusia
tanpa persetujuan Kreditor Penerima Fidusia dan perlindungan hukum yang
diberikan kepada Kreditor Penerima Fidusia apabila terjadi pengalihan objek
jaminan fidusia yang dilakukan oleh Debitor Pemberi Fidusia tanpa persetujuan
Kreditor Penerima Fidusia.
Metode penelitian hukum yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah
metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan data sekunder yang
terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, dan bahan hukum
tertier, dan data yang diperoleh dianalisis dengan mengunakan analisis yuridis
normatif.
Penelitian yang telah dilakukan diperoleh hasil bahwa apabila terjadi
pengalihan objek jaminan fidusia yang dilakukan oleh Debitor Pemberi Fidusia
tanpa persetujuan Kreditor Penerima Fidusia akan menimbulkan akibat hukum,
Kreditor Penerima Fidusia dapat menuntut Debitor Pemberi Fidusia untuk
melakukan pemenuhan prestasi pelunasan utangnya, dan perlindungan hukum
yang diberikan kepada Kreditor Penerima Fidusia dapat berupa dalam bentuk
preventif (sebelum) maupun represif (setelah) terjadinya pengalihan objek
jaminan fidusia tanpa persetujuan Kreditor Penerima Fidusia.
Saran yang penulis dapat berikan adalah Notaris sebelum pembuatan Akta
Jaminan Fidusia sebaiknya memberikan penyuluhan hukum mengenai laranganlarangan
dalam Undang-Undang Jaminan Fidusia kepada para pihak yang akan
membuat akta.
Kata Kunci: Perlindungan Hukum, Pengalihan objek jaminan fidusia, Penerima
Fidusia, Pemberi Fidusia.
ABSTRACT
This thesis research and writing are aimed at determining the resulting
legal consequences in case of the transfer of fiduciary security objects done by the
Debitor as the Fiduciary Provider without obtaining the approval of the Creditor
as the Fiduciary Recipient and the legal grounds why the Creditor shall receive
legal protection in case of the transfer of fiduciary security objects done by the
Debitor as the Fiduciary Provider without obtaining the approval of the Creditor
as the Fiduciary Recipient as well as the legal protection given to the Creditor as
the Fiduciary Recipient in case of the transfer of fiduciary security objects done
by the Debitor as the Fiduciary Provider without obtaining the approval of the
Creditor as the Fiduciary Recipient.
The normative legal research method was employed in this legal research
using secondary data consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legal
materials. The obtained data were analyzed using the normative juridical
analysis.
The research findings suggest that the transfer of fiduciary security objects
done by the Debitor as the Fiduciary Provider without obtaining the approval of
the Creditor as the Fiduciary Recipient will bring legal consequences, i.e. the
Creditor as the Fiduciary Recipient may sue the Debitor as the Fiduciary
Provider to completely repay its debts, and the legal protection given to the
Creditor as the Fiduciary Recipient may be either in the form of preventive
actions done previously or repressive actions done after the transfer of fiduciary
security objects without obtaining the approval of the Creditor as the Fiduciary
Recipient has been undertaken.
The suggestions which the author can offer is that the Notary prior to the
issuance of the Fiduciary Security Deed should provide legal counseling
regarding matters which do not conform with the Law on Fiduciary Security to
the parties intending to make a deed.
Keywords: Legal Protection, Transfer of Fiduciary Security Objects, Creditor,
Debitor.