Penulis Utama : Akwila Pauran
Penulis Tambahan : -
NIM / NIP : E0009021
Tahun : 2015
Judul : Tinjauan Penyatuan Beberapa Terdakwa dalam Satu Berkas Dakwaan Oleh Penuntut Umum dan Implikasi Yuridisnya pada Penuntutan Perkara Pemerasan Di Pengadilan Negeri Boyolali (Studi Putusan Nomor : 89/Pid.B/2014/PN.Byl.)
Edisi :
Imprint : Surakarta - F. Hukum - 2015
Kolasi :
Sumber : UNS-F. Hukum Jur. Ilmu Hukum-E0009021-2015
Jenis Dokumen : Skripsi
Abstrak :

The purpose of this study is to describe the procedure Unification Some Defendant In One File Charges By Prosecution And Implications juridical In Extortion Case Prosecution In Boyolali District Court (Study of Decision Number: 89 / Pid.B / 2014 / PN.Byl.).
This study is a prescriptive legal research and applied. The data used are primary data and secondary data. Data collection techniques used is through the study of literature. Qualitative data analysis techniques with deductive analysis.
The results showed that the compiled form of the indictment Public Prosecutor in case No. 89 / Pid.B / 2014 / pn.byl. a single charge with proof of the charges carried out sequentially beginning on charges of criminal offense punishable by up to charges toughest considered proven. Criminal act committed by the defendant contain elements of a single act that is extortion. Shape public prosecutor filed charges are the sole charge that the defendants had violated Article 368 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 365 paragraph 2 of the 2nd Criminal Code. Form of single charges filed prosecutor performed sequentially by starting on charges of criminal offense punishable by up to charges toughest criminal offense punishable by mild to charges considered proven. Related to the unification of several defendants in a case file that is done by the Public Prosecutor, according to the judges, it can be done, because the defendant had already approved. In addition to the unification of several defendants in the indictment that in addition to providing a positive effect ie a shorter time trials and court costs cheaper. Merging multiple indictment with multiple defendants, is feasible. Juridical implications of the legal construction compiled Prosecutor for sentencing that did not show a significant effect, thus it is because Judge Decision of 8 months while the demands by the public prosecutor 1 year 6 months. So it is not in accordance with the penalty of the crime of theft by weighting with a penalty of 7 years. The judge gives the maximum penalty for the Public Prosecutor demands that only requires 6 months.
Keywords: Unification of several defendants, juridical implications, extortion

File Dokumen Tugas Akhir : abstrak.pdf
Harus menjadi member dan login terlebih dahulu untuk bisa download.
Bab 0.pdf
Bab 1.pdf
Bab 2.pdf
Bab 3.pdf
Bab 4.pdf
File Dokumen Karya Dosen : -
Status : Public
Pembimbing : 1. Kristiyadi, S.H., M.Hum.
Catatan Umum :
Fakultas : Fak. Hukum