This study examines the handling of criminal acts of corruption by the Tipikor Court in relation to the principles of fast, simple, and low-cost justice to develop an ideal policy concept of competency in handling corruption cases in Indonesia in the future. This study aims to answer why the handling of criminal acts of corruption by the courts of criminal acts of corruption has not fulfilled the principles of a fast, simple and low-cost trial and what is the ideal concept of handling corruption in the future. This research is a non-doctrinal or empirical legal research using primary and secondary data.

The results of this legal research are first, the current handling of corruption cases has not met the principles of fast, simple and low-cost justice. This can be observed from the law factor that the rules are limitative to the implementation of trials of corruption in Indonesia, law enforcement factors in the form of limited human resources, the community factor is the reluctance of the public to attend as witnesses in court, the infrastructure factor is the distance distance and access is quite far and the cultural factor is the culture of law enforcement officials in Indonesia as the mouthpiece of the law. In the future, the settlement of corruption cases needs to be carried out through general courts to reduce the accumulation of cases in the Corruption Courts, save operational costs, and guarantee safety, security and health for law enforcement officials. The conclusion from this research is that currently the handling of corruption cases in the Corruption Courts does not yet fulfill the principles of fast, simple and low-cost justice, which can be observed from the several factors above. Therefore, it is necessary to formulate a new concept so that the handling of criminal acts of corruption can fulfill the principles of fast, simple and low-cost justice. One alternative is through a general court.