Penulis Utama : Riza Ghitasetia Gesyta
NIM / NIP : E0011269
×

ABSTRACT
This research aimed to find out the judge of Bandung District Court’s rationale in hearing and deciding on the fraud crime case in mercury import service business by presenting the export-import expert before the court.
Thus study was a normative law research that was presprictive and applied in nature with case approach. The law material source used was primary and secondary law material using library study constituting books, documents, and archive available in research lovation. Technique of analyzing law material used was deductive syllogism analysis technique.
The result of research showed that the information giving by export-import expert in fraud case trial in Bandung District Court had been consistent with the provision of KUHAP as governed in Article 184 Clause (1) of KUHAP and judge’s rationale in sentencing its verdict by presenting an export-import expert, witness information and other evidence before the court. The consitency of information from expert, witness, and other evidence was used by the judge as the foundation that the fraud crime of mercury import service had actually occured and the judge stated that the defendant was evidently guilty.
Keywords : Fraud Case, Export-Import Expert, Judge Rationale

×
Penulis Utama : Riza Ghitasetia Gesyta
Penulis Tambahan : -
NIM / NIP : E0011269
Tahun : 2015
Judul : Tinjauan Pemberian Keterangan Oleh Ahli Ekspor Impor dalam Persidangan Perkara Penipuan di Pengadilan Negeri Bandung dan Kekuatan Pembuktiannya (Studi Putusan Nomor : 564/PID.B/2014/PN.BDG)
Edisi :
Imprint : Surakarta - F. Hukum - 2015
Program Studi : S-1 Ilmu Hukum
Kolasi :
Sumber : UNS-F. Hukum Jur. Ilmu Hukum-E0011269-2015
Kata Kunci :
Jenis Dokumen : Skripsi
ISSN :
ISBN :
Link DOI / Jurnal : -
Status : Public
Pembimbing : 1. Bambang Santoso, S.H.,M.Hum
Penguji :
Catatan Umum :
Fakultas : Fak. Hukum
×
File : Harus menjadi member dan login terlebih dahulu untuk bisa download.